Inside Trump’s Plan to Acquire Greenland: A Focus on Persuasion

By Michael Crowley and Maggie Haberman
Reporting from Washington | April 10, 2025

President Donald Trump’s longstanding aspiration to acquire Greenland has taken a significant step forward, shifting from mere rhetoric to official U.S. policy. The Trump administration is implementing a formal strategy aimed at acquiring the Arctic island from Denmark, highlighting both its economic and strategic importance amid changing climate conditions.

The Importance of Greenland

Amid rising temperatures that are causing Arctic ice to melt, Greenland's value has become increasingly apparent. With an area of approximately 836,330 square miles, the island presents what Trump perceives as one of the most significant real estate opportunities in history. U.S. officials argue that gaining control of Greenland would enhance national security interests, as well as uphold international security.

In a recent address to Congress, Trump emphasized the necessity of acquiring Greenland, stating, “We need Greenland for national security and even international security,” and added, “One way or the other, we’re going to get it.” This statement reaffirms the administration's commitment to pursue the acquisition of the island.

Danish Response

Despite the U.S. government's intentions, Danish officials have firmly stated that Greenland is not for sale. They express deep frustration over Trump's persistent interest in the island, prompting ongoing discussions internally about how to respond to the U.S. position. The reaction from both Denmark's leadership and residents is one of anger and disbelief, reflecting the sensitivity surrounding Greenland’s status as an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.

A Multi-Department Approach

The plan for Greenland involves coordination among various U.S. cabinet departments, signaling a robust approach to what the Trump administration views as a significant strategic initiative. Officials are likely to focus on diplomatic outreach, emphasizing persuasion rather than any more aggressive measures, aiming to convince both Danish leaders and the local population of the benefits of U.S. stewardship.

Conclusion

As the Trump administration advances its agenda regarding Greenland, the interplay between U.S. ambitions and the strong resistance from Denmark will shape the future of this contentious issue. Whether through diplomatic channels or other means, the administration seems resolute on pursuing what it views as a vital addition to national interests in the Arctic region.

This situation continues to develop, and further news on the U.S. plan regarding Greenland is anticipated in the upcoming weeks.